EVO ICL矫正中度近视的有效性和视觉质量更佳、干眼发生风险更低--与SMILE相比

2024-12-18 12:00   来源: 互联网

导语

如今人们更加重视屈光手术的整体视觉质量,而不仅仅是视力。角膜屈光手术诱发像差改变十分常见,但有晶状体眼人工晶状体植入发生像差改变的情况并不显著[9,10]。对于高度近视病例,有晶状体眼人工晶状体相较于SMILE的术后视觉质量更好[9,11,12]。但关于中度近视的文献却很有限。本研究探讨了EVO ICL和SMILE对中度近视患者的视觉和屈光效果。

研究结果由印度的Rajesh Sinha团队,于2024年9月发表在Indian Journal of Ophthalmology杂志上。

研究方法

本研究纳入2018年6月至2019年11月接受EVO ICL植入或SMILE手术的患者,平均随访一年。检查项目包括:裸眼远视力(UCVA)、矫正远视力(CDVA)、屈光度、裂隙灯检查、眼压、角膜内皮细胞密度、拱高、对比敏感度、高阶像差(HOA)、调制传递函数(MTF)、点扩散函数(PSF)和患者满意度调查问卷21,22。研究结果

纳入30例患者的60只眼,其中15例(30眼,平均MRSE为-5.4±1.17D)接受双眼EVO ICL植入,15例(30眼,平均MRSE为-5.22±1.05D)接受双眼SMILE手术。术前两组的平均泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)和Schirmer I无显著差异(P=0.29和P=0.17),两组患者均无干眼症。(表1)

视力及眼压结果

两组患者术后的UCVA变化如图1所示。术后一年,EVO ICL组的有效性(UCVA≥20/20)为93.3%(n=28/30),SMILE组为83.3%(n=25/30)。在随访期间,两组所有眼睛的CDVA均为20/20,两种手术的安全性均为100%。末次随访时两组的可预测性(±0.5D)均为100%。(表3)

对比敏感度

术前两组的对比敏感度无显著性差异。术后一年,与SMILE组(1.70±0.13log CS)相比,EVO ICL组具有更高的对比敏感度(1.82±0.10log CS)(P=0.0002)。(表3)

像差

iTrace对像差的评估表明,术前两组的大多数参数无显著性差异。术后一年SMILE组的所有像差参数均显著增加、MTF显著降低,而EVO ICL组没有观察到显著变化。相较于SMILE组,EVO ICL组的像差更低、MTF值更高。(表2)

视觉质量调查问卷

EVO ICL组的“QoV问卷”平均得分为3.33±3.72,SMILE组为7.20±8.65,表明EVO ICL组的视觉质量比SMILE组更好(P=0.64)。在询问眩光的严重程度时,SMILE组的4名患者都报告眩光中度严重并令人烦扰,但EVO ICL组没有患者报告眩光严重或令人烦扰。

干眼检查参数

术后一年EVO ICL组的TBUT无显著变化(11.6±2.5秒 vs. 11.1±2.7秒;P=0.35),而SMILE组的TBUT显著下降(10.9±1.7秒 vs. 9.3±3.2秒;P=0.02),且两组的TBUT值存在显著差异(11.06±2.65与8.96±1.75;P=0.0006),其中EVO ICL组的值较高。另外,两组间的Schirmer I值也存在显著差异(P=0.0001)。(表3)

(表2)

(表3)

(表4)


讨论

多项研究发现[9,11,12],与SMILE相比,接受ICL植入的患者有效性指数更高。本研究结果类似,EVO ICL组与SMILE组相比有效性更优(93.3% vs 83.3%)。先前的研究显示[9,11,12],ICL组与SMILE组的安全性指数相当或更佳。在本研究中,EVO ICL组和SMILE组矫正中度近视显示出相似的安全性。

屈光手术后像差的改变是患者对视觉质量不满意的重要原因。既往研究报道[11,23,24],因为ICL术后患者的角膜基本保持不变,ICL术后像差优于SMILE术后。本研究结果相似,与SMILE相比,中度近视患者植入EVO ICL后的像差更低、MTF更高。

对比敏感度是影响视觉质量的另一个重要方面。多项研究报告发现[25-27],中高度近视患者ICL术后的对比敏感度均有所提高,而SMILE术后对比敏感度无明显变化[28,29]。本研究结果类似,对于中度近视患者来说,EVO ICL术眼相较于SMILE术眼,对比敏感度更高。

据报道,相较于其他角膜屈光手术,SMILE术后干眼症的风险更低[30,31],但在SMILE病例中,仍然观察到干眼检查参数的短暂下降。本研究中,接受EVO ICL植入的病例在末次随访时的干眼检查参数比SMILE更好,主要原因可能是ICL植入不切削角膜。

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

1、EVO ICL植入矫正中度近视安全有效、预测性好。

2、EVO ICL保留了角膜的完整性,其矫正中度近视的对比敏感度以及术后像差更优,患者视觉质量更好。

3、因不切削角膜,EVO ICL术后干眼检查参数更优,干眼发生风险更低。

文献来源

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39257104/

参考文献

1. Aristeidou A, Taniguchi EV, Tsatsos M, Muller R, McAlinden C, Pineda R, et al. The evolution of corneal and refractive surgery with the femtosecond laser. Eye Vis (Lond). 2015;2:12.

2. Faith SC, Jhanji V. Refractive surgery: History in the making. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2017;6:4012.

3. Packer M. Metaanalysis and review: Effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:105977.

4. Ikeda T, Shimizu K, IgarashiA, Kasahara S, Kamiya K. Twelveyear followup of laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:9391436.

5. IgarashiA, Shimizu K, Kamiya K. Eightyear followup of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation for moderate to high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;157:5329.e1.

6. Moshirfar M, Somani AN, Motlagh MN, Vaidyanathan U, Sumsion JS, Barnes JR, et al. Comparison of FDAreported visual and refractive outcomes of the Toric ICL Lens, SMILE, and topographyguided LASIK for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. JRefract Surg 2019;35:699706.

7. Ghemame M, Charpentier P, Mouriaux F. Corneal topography in clinical practice. J Fr Ophtalmol 2019;42:e43951.

8. Fan R, Chan TC, Prakash G, Jhanji V. Applications of corneal topography and tomography: A review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2018;46:13346.

9. Qin Q, Bao L, Yang L, He Z, Huang Z. Comparison of visual quality after EVOICL implantation and SMILE to select the appropriate surgical method for high myopia. BMC Ophthalmol 2019;19:21.

10. MorenoBarriuso E, Lloves JM, Marcos S, Navarro R, Llorente L, Barbero S. Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery: LASIKinduced changes measured with laser ray tracing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1396403.

11. Siedlecki J, Schmelter V, Mayer WJ, Schworm B, Priglinger SG, Dirisamer M, et al. SMILE versus implantable collamer lens implantation for high myopia: A matched comparative study. J Refract Surg 2020;36:1509.

12. Wei R, Li M, Zhang H, Aruma A, Miao H, Wang X, et al. Comparison of objective and subjective visual quality early after implantable collamer lens V4c (ICL V4c) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia correction. Acta Ophthalmol 2020;98:e94350.

13. Brown AM, Njeru SM, Osman M. What is the best test distance for the PelliRobson Chart? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2019;60:3906.

14. Xu Z, Hua Y, Qiu W, Li G, Wu Q. Precision and agreement of higher order aberrations measured with ray tracing and HartmannShack aberrometers. BMC Ophthalmol 2018;18:18.

15. McAlinden C, Pesudovs K, Moore JE. The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: The Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:553745.

16. Ganesh S, Brar S, Pawar A. Matched population comparison of visual outcomes and patient satisfaction between 3 modalities for the correction of low to moderate myopic astigmatism. Clin Ophthalmol 2017;11:125363.

17. Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Kobashi H. Longterm comparison of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole (Hole ICL and Conventional ICL) implantation for moderate to high myopia and myopic astigmatism. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e3270.

18. Jin HY, Wan T, Wu F, Yao K. Comparison of visual results and higherorder aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): High myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia. BMC Ophthalmol 2017;17:118.

19. Xia F, Shen Y, Han T, Zhao J, Xu H, Zhou X. Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for moderate and high myopia: Sevenyear outcomes of refraction, corneal tomography, and wavefront aberrations. J Ophthalmol 2020;2020:3825864.

20. Lin F, Xu Y, Yang Y. Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laserassisted LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg 2014;30:24854.

21. Han T, Xu Y, Han X, Zeng L, Shang J, Chen X, et al. Threeyear outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laserassisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FSLASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism. Br J Ophthalmol 2019;103:5658.

22. Liu M, Chen Y, Wang D, Zhou Y, Zhang X, He J, et al. Clinical outcomes after SMILE and femtosecond laserassisted LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism: A prospective randomized comparative study. Cornea 2016;35:2106.

23. Xia LK, Ma J, Liu HN, Shi C, Huang Q. Threeyear results of small incision lenticule extraction and wavefrontguided femtosecond laserassisted laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of high myopia and myopic astigmatism. Int J Ophthalmol 2018;11:4707.

24. Yan H, Gong LY, Huang W, Peng YL. Clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laserassisted LASIK for myopia: A metaanalysis. Int J Ophthalmol 2017;10:143645.

25. JiménezAlfaro I, GómezTellería G, Bueno JL, Puy P. Contrast sensitivity after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation for high myopia. J Refract Surg 2001;17:6415.

26. Igarashi A, Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Komatsu M. Visual performance after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefrontguided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;148:16470.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo. 2009.02.001.

27. Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Kitazawa Y, Kojima T, Nakamura T, et al. Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation: Comparative, multicentre study in 351 eyes with lowtomoderate or high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2018;102:17781.

28. Sekundo W, Gertnere J, Bertelmann T, Solomatin I. Oneyear refractive results, contrast sensitivity, highorder aberrations and complications after myopic smallincision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014;252:83743.

29. Gyldenkerne A, Ivarsen A, Nisted I, Hjortdal J. Impact on binocular visual function of smallincision lenticule extraction for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021;47:4308.

30. Kobashi H, Kamiya K, Shimizu K. Dry eye after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laserassisted LASIK: Metaanalysis. Cornea 2017;36:8591.

31. Sambhi RDS, Sambhi GDS, Mather R, MalvankarMehta MS. Dry eye after refractive surgery: A metaanalysis. Can J Ophthalmol 2020;55:99106.

32. Aruma A, Li M, Choi J, Miao H, Wei R, Yang D, et al. Visual outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction and implantable collamer lens V4c for moderate myopia: 1year results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021;259:243140.


责任编辑:Linda
分享到:
0
【慎重声明】凡本站未注明来源为"中华财经网"的所有作品,均转载、编译或摘编自其它媒体,转载、编译或摘编的目的在于传递更多信息,并不代表本站赞同其观点和对其真实性负责。如因作品内容、版权和其他问题需要同本网联系的,请在30日内进行!